Saving Thatcher's child

Let Channel 4 make its own shows, says shadow culture secretary Jeremy Hunt

Bearing in mind that the Conservative Party occasionally seems to change certain policies depending on whatever consensus happens to be in vogue at the time, it's perhaps wise not to read too much into policy statements made by anyone with the word 'Shadow' in the title.

However there is a point of interest buried within the notion that Channel 4 should be allowed to freely make its own programmes, and this relates to the terms of trade established between broadcasters and the independent production companies that have flourished in recent years.

If Channel 4 is to be self-supporting in the current climate as well as maintaining a form of public service remit, then it needs a form of revenue above and beyond the commercials and sponsorship packages that it sells to advertisers. However if additional money isn't readily available then some very tough choices will have to be made.

The brutal truth is that if there isn't enough money to go round within the media industry, then either broadcasters or independent production companies will suffer badly as a result since there just isn't the income to support both groups as they currently stand.

And since the terms of trade are currently tilted towards the indies, the messy end result threatens to damage considerably more than Channel 4's public service remit.

Current rumours suggest that the hitherto unconsidered privatisation option for Channel 4 is now being seriously considered by government ministers, and it's this that is the likely basis for Jeremy Hunt's current stance in relation to a private future for the channel. (Also bear in mind that Channel 4 itself was very much a Thatcherite child.)

If the likes of Channel 4 were to be privatised then that process in itself would most likely kill off many small independent producers as programme commissioning would inevitably shift towards mass market crowd-pleasers, and although Ofcom makes lots of noises about public service plurality it would have no final say on this issue whatsoever.

So it's now easy to conclude that current Conservative policy in relation to Channel 4 is primarily designed to service the smaller independent producers that was the original intention for the channel, and in one sense you can see the logic behind this especially in relation to protecting the original intention that was behind "Thatcher's child".

Until they change their mind of course.

Sorry. Comments have been disabled on this post.

MediaBlog

MediaBlog

Feeds

This Article

Email Newsletter

Get all our updates in your inbox - every time there's news to tell. Just enter your email address and select "Subscribe". Or if you no longer want to receive our mailings, enter your email and select "Unsubscribe"

Small Print

Opinions expressed in these posts are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Transdiffusion Broadcasting System in general.

These posts and their multimedia are copyright. Some rights are reserved under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence.

The Index

From Twitter

RT @MrPhilNorman: RIP Eugene Polley. Delighting portly character actors since 1955: http://t.co/FW3YEQwr

Posted on 23 May at 11:07

RT @LFBarfe: #Eurovision is the most obvious manifestation of the #EBU. The EBU was founded in Torquay. | @Psythor, he's another to ask.

Posted on 22 May at 21:54

RT @LFBarfe: Do you notice they're using wired mics for the BBC inserts? At a guess, the main show is using all the wireless frequencies ...

Posted on 22 May at 21:50

Follow us on Twitter ⇒

Archiving Project

Find out more about our new archiving project and how you can help from the comfort of your own computer

Read more and join in ⇒

Transdiffusion Navigation

May 2012

Transdiffusion Broadcasting System

This web page lives at: http://www.transdiffusion.org/blog/2009/01/saving_thatchers_child